I missed the last model telecon and I have not seen any minutes? Did anyone
take minutes or plan to distribute them.
Scott
>>> <Keith_Carter@aussmtp.austin.ibm.com> 04/29 8:19 AM >>>
The purpose of this note is to attain agreement on the documentation of
status codes in the Model document.
Based on the discussion at the MOD telecon on 4/25 and Bob Herriot's
protocol document, I propose that the Model document describe status
codes using generic terms (e.g. bad-request) instead of specific values
(e.g. "400"). A protocol document can then use the descriptions of the
status codes and map these descriptions to specific status code values
and messages for a protocol like Bob did in his protocol document. With
this approach, protocol implementations of IPP should behave
consistently.
Here is an example of what we can put in the Model document:
4.4.2.1 bad-request
The request could not be understood by the IPP Printer due to
malformed syntax. The IPP application should not repeat the
request without modifications.
In the case of Bob's protocol document, bad-request maps to "400".
If we agree, then I will modify my previous note on status codes and
resend for your review. If anyone has another idea, please put it on
the table so we can close this matter.
Thanks,
Keith