Why not? If the flash upgrade is kept to a DIFF-type of upgrade, it
could work just fine.
>What about all of the embedded graphics files (gif, jpeg, pcx, tiff,
>etc.)? Does the printer have to have code to convert all of these to
>printable output?
Absolutely! Having these interpreters in the printer is required if the
printer is expected to print HTML pages. Some of the lesser known image
types can be avoided. I don't think there are too many documents out
there with Atari ST Degas pictures on them :).
>What about other files (.doc, .prz, .ppt, .xls, .mov, .avi, .pdf,
>etc.)? Does the printer have to have code to handle all of these?
Not unless you can watch movies on a piece of paper :)
Seriously, there are some data types that shouldn't HAVE to be printed.
That's the whole point of a PDF file (which should be handled).
>What about plug-ins and applets? Does the printer have to have a Java
>Virtual Machine to run Java applets?
I'm still waiting for something to show that Java is nothing more than
hype at this point anyway.
>I have to strongly protest print by reference as it causes the
>requirement load on the printer to skyrocket.
I can't disagree with you there, but it's an unfortunate requirement at
this point. What SHOULD happen is a common data model...but we all know
what kind of a pipe dream that is. If IPP takes off, then I believe
responsible web masters will place data on pages in a format that will
be suited for IPP devices and all will be well.
Mike Gaines
Internet Imaging Manager
Pipeline Assoc. Inc.
starman@powerpage.com