IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP>MOD maximum lengths of some strings not explicitly stated

Re: IPP>MOD maximum lengths of some strings not explicitly stated

don@lexmark.com
Wed, 19 Nov 1997 07:54:18 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Carl-Uno Manros: "IPP> Separate IPPDEV list will cease to exist as of tomorrow"
Previous message: Tom Hastings: "IPP> Comments on Operation attributes and operation validation"

Larry Masinter said:
>
>Make it 100K bytes. That should hold them.
>
>Honestly, is there any reason to make the minimum any smaller? Given
>that the printers have to spool large documents, anyway?
Your assumption is incorrect. IPP is designed so that printers
do not have to spool large documents. 100K is a ridiculous
assumption; in fact with the exception of perhaps a URI 1K
is probably going too far. Please put away your DocuTech
and think about printers that cost less than $1000.

Don

**********************************************
* Don Wright don@lexmark.com *
* Product Manager, Strategic Alliances *
* Lexmark International *
* 740 New Circle Rd *
* Lexington, Ky 40550 *
* 606-232-4808 (phone) 606-232-6740 (fax) *
**********************************************

Next message: Carl-Uno Manros: "IPP> Separate IPPDEV list will cease to exist as of tomorrow"
Previous message: Tom Hastings: "IPP> Comments on Operation attributes and operation validation"