IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> MOD - Updated Section 15.3 from Bob, Scott, Roger,

Re: IPP> MOD - Updated Section 15.3 from Bob, Scott, Roger,

Scott Isaacson (SISAACSON@novell.com)
Tue, 09 Dec 1997 22:24:09 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Carl-Uno Manros: "Re: IPP> MOD - Updated Section 15.3 from Bob, Scott, Roger,"
Previous message: Carl-Uno Manros: "IPP> Re: IPP and the security area (Re: Area Directors' comments on"
Next in thread: Carl-Uno Manros: "Re: IPP> MOD - Updated Section 15.3 from Bob, Scott, Roger,"

Carl has suggested that there might not be a need Validate-Job.

I haven't seen any public responses? Does silence mean AGREE or DISAGREE?
Or is
everyone like me - don't know yet.

Carl also asks:

>>> Carl Kugler <kugler@us.ibm.com> 12/05 9:26 AM >>>
> Side question: does an IPP error response have an HTTP status code of
> Successful "200 OK"?

The answer to this is YES. The HTTP POST worked fine. The
"application/ipp" body within
the POST had the error.

Next message: Carl-Uno Manros: "Re: IPP> MOD - Updated Section 15.3 from Bob, Scott, Roger,"
Previous message: Carl-Uno Manros: "IPP> Re: IPP and the security area (Re: Area Directors' comments on"
Next in thread: Carl-Uno Manros: "Re: IPP> MOD - Updated Section 15.3 from Bob, Scott, Roger,"