IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> MOD - Updated Section 15.3 from Bob, Scott, Roger,

Re: IPP> MOD - Updated Section 15.3 from Bob, Scott, Roger,

Roger K Debry (rdebry@us.ibm.com)
Wed, 10 Dec 1997 08:32:44 -0500

I'd prefer to leave it in.

Roger K deBry
Senior Technical Staff Member
Architecture and Technology
IBM Printing Systems
email: rdebry@us.ibm.com
phone: 1-303-924-4080

---------------------- Forwarded by Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM on 12/10/=
97 06:32
AM ---------------------------

ipp-owner@pwg.org
12/09/97 10:43 PM
Please respond to ipp-owner@pwg.org @ internet

To: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM@ibmus, ipp@pwg.org @ internet
cc:
Subject: Re: IPP> MOD - Updated Section 15.3 from Bob, Scott, Roger,

Carl has suggested that there might not be a need Validate-Job.

I haven't seen any public responses? Does silence mean AGREE or DISAGR=
EE?
Or is
everyone like me - don't know yet.

Carl also asks:

>>> Carl Kugler <kugler@us.ibm.com> 12/05 9:26 AM >>>
> Side question: does an IPP error response have an HTTP status code o=
f
> Successful "200 OK"?

The answer to this is YES. The HTTP POST worked fine. The
"application/ipp" body within
the POST had the error.

=