What about being real straight-forward and calling it one of the following:
TLS-Printer-uri
Printer-TLS-uri
Actually, secure-printer-uri is exactly what is says it is and printer-uri
says
nothing about security. I'm not opposed to calling it what it is and
living with
the implications of that.
Don
**********************************************
* Don Wright don@lexmark.com *
* Product Manager, Strategic Alliances *
* Lexmark International *
* 740 New Circle Rd *
* Lexington, Ky 40550 *
* 606-232-4808 (phone) 606-232-6740 (fax) *
**********************************************
-----------------------------------------------
To: ipp%pwg.org@interlock.lexmark.com
cc: SISAACSON%novell.com@interlock.lexmark.com,
szilles%Adobe.COM@interlock.lexmark.com (bcc: Don Wright)
bcc: Don Wright
Subject: IPP> MOD - URGENT: Ok to call 2nd printer uri: "printer-map-uri"?
In Washington and before, there has been discussion that calling
the second uri, "printer-secure-uri" makes it sound like the first
"printer-uri" is not secure. So we've been searching for a better
term.
Scott and Steve came up with the term (drum roll):
"Mutual Authentication and Privacy (MAP).
So ok to call the second uri Printer attribute: "printer-map-uri"?
It will be put right after the first uri: "printer-uri" secion
4.4.2 in the Model document.
SEND COMMENTS TO DL, SO WE CAN FORWARD THE INTERNET-DRAFT THIS WEEK
TO THE IESG.
Thanks,
Tom