IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> Question about rangeOfInteger

Re: IPP> Question about rangeOfInteger

Robert Herriot (Robert.Herriot@Eng.Sun.COM)
Thu, 8 Jan 1998 13:32:26 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tom Hastings: "Re: IPP> MOD - Definition for 'reverse-portrait' enum value"
Previous message: Carl Kugler: "Re: IPP> Re: URI scheme and port numbers for TLS"
Maybe in reply to: Chawla,Rajesh: "IPP> Question about rangeOfInteger"

> From Rajesh_Chawla@xn.xerox.com Thu Jan 8 13:22:37 1998
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm confused about the rangeOfInteger type. The protocol document says
> that rangeOfInteger should have 2 integers that represent the min and
> the max. My question is where should the value go?

The "value" in the protocol sense, is the 8 bytes of the 2 4-byte
integers, the min-value first and then the max-value.

>
> Rajesh
>

Next message: Tom Hastings: "Re: IPP> MOD - Definition for 'reverse-portrait' enum value"
Previous message: Carl Kugler: "Re: IPP> Re: URI scheme and port numbers for TLS"
Maybe in reply to: Chawla,Rajesh: "IPP> Question about rangeOfInteger"