P1394 Mail Archive: RE: P1394> Scope of EMAIL Poll

P1394 Mail Archive: RE: P1394> Scope of EMAIL Poll

RE: P1394> Scope of EMAIL Poll

Gregory A. LeClair (gleclair@agentz.com)
Tue, 24 Feb 1998 00:32:15 -0800

The scope is printing.

Feel free to elaborate if you want to answer the poll.

Regards,

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: Atsushi_Nakamura [SMTP:atsnaka@bsd.canon.co.jp]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 1998 7:53 PM
To: gleclair@agentz.com; '1394 PWG'
Subject: P1394> Scope of EMAIL Poll

1 question concerning the scope of this poll ;

1) What is the scope of the "interest level"? PC prinitng, Consumer

peer to peer printing, or both ?

Also,

If I was in charge of this poll, I would add another question to the survey.

3) Opinions on multiple printing protocols;

( ) There should be ONLY 1 printing protocol in any case and any application.

( ) 2 protocols are ACCEPTABLE if necessary for different situations

( ) I PREFER more than 2 protocols

( ) Other (describe)__________________

At 18:35 98/02/23 -0800, Gregory A. LeClair wrote:

> During the 1394 PWG 2/23 telecon, it was suggested we undertake an non-binding email poll to

> gauge interest in various proposals being considered by the working group.

>

> Please forward your reply to the 1394 PWG reflector - p1394@pwg.org

>

> If possible, please reply by Friday, February 27th, 1998.

>

> Thanks,

> Greg LeClair

>

> PS> If you have suggestions for this or future polls, please send them under a different

> subject line.

>

> ===================================================================

>

> 1. Please rank the following proposals according to your interest level using the following scale ( 10 = High level

> of interest vs. 0 = No interest).

>

> ( ) 1284.4 Over Data FIFO Architecture (DFA)

> ( ) 1284.4 Over SBP-2

> ( ) Direct Printing Protocol - (current PWG-C proposal 0.71)

> ( ) SBP-2 Native - (current PWG proposal 0.1c)

> ( ) Other (describe)__________________

>

> 2. Please provide background comments on your ranking.

>

> Why do you prefer to use the given solution?

>

> Why should others consider the given solution?

>

> Does the the given solution meet the existing requirements?

>

> What issues are you aware of (if any) with the given solution?

>

> What is your opinion on the best way to move the discussion forward?

>

> Other comments?

>

>

>

>

>

>

-----------------------------------------

<bigger>Atsushi Nakamura

</bigger>-----------------------------------------

BJ Technology Develpoment 22,

Canon Inc.

53 Imai Kami-cho

Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki-shi

postal no. 211

tel:+81-3-44-733-6111(ext.5593)

+81-3-44-739-6634(direct)

fax:+81-3-44-739-6756

email(1):Atsushi_Nakamura@cbj.canon.co.jp

email(2):atsnaka@bsd.canon.co.jp

-----------------------------------------