P1394 Mail Archive: RE: P1394> Conference call Agenda

P1394 Mail Archive: RE: P1394> Conference call Agenda

RE: P1394> Conference call Agenda

Turner, Randy (rturner@sharplabs.com)
Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:02:21 -0800

Concerning the conference call...

Someone needs to give me a time that is convenient for both U.S and
Japan participants....

What did we use last time?

Randy

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg LeClair [SMTP:gregoryl@spider.epson.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 1998 6:13 PM
To: 'Greg Shue'; Turner, Randy
Cc: don@lexmark.com; p1394@pwg.org
Subject: RE: P1394> Conference call Agenda

Do we have a telecon scheduled?
If not tomorrow(Thurs), then Friday or Monday.

Idea for an Agenda

Revised proposal summary
- Alan Berkema tells me we'll have revision up by Monday 3/23

Feedback received
- How does it revise the model?
- Is it a Unit Directory that provides a Function?
- Is a Function is provided by one or more Services?
- Individual Services are accessed via LUNs?
- Glossary terms to consider adding to profile document

Issues with revised model
- Different LUNs represent different services
- List of functions and required services
- Do we know everything we need to access a function?

Other issues?

Regards,

Greg LeClair

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Shue [SMTP:gregs@sdd.hp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 1998 11:46 AM
To: Turner, Randy
Cc: don@lexmark.com; p1394@pwg.org
Subject: Re: P1394> Conference call proposal

I agree that we need to call it. The time frames
are OK for me, but 4PM EST is too early in Japan.
(8 or 9 hrs before 1pm Pacific, i.e. 4-5 AM Japan!)

Greg Shue

>
>
> Uh, make that 4 PM EST. on 3/19 Is that ok?
>
> Randy

--
Greg Shue
Hewlett-Packard Company
Office Products Division gregs@sdd.hp.com
----------------------------------------------------------------