About Jerry's comment below
"Please review since with the movement of objects from the Port to
the Printer table, some of the language might not make sense anymore."
- as I moved each object, I tried to carefully edit the DESCRIPTION and
REFERENCE clauses to convert from single port scope to printer scope
- but please _do_ think about these descriptions (everywhere in the MIB)
- and please read the new Requirements section carefully
Because we're pretty close to wrapping this document up and going to
Formal Vote for Candidate Standard.
- Ira (co-editor of Printer Port Monitor MIB)
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 11:18 AM
Subject: PMP> Updated PortMON MIB specification (that includes the
restructured 20050728 mib)
The changes include the restructuring of the requirements language,
the integration of the latest restructured mib,
hopefully catching all the names that changed from portxxx to printerxxx,
(e.g., portHrDeviceIndex to printerHrDeviceIndex), and updateing the
mib description the best I can.
Posted on the PWG FTP server in the PMP WG directories at:
Summary of changes:
(1) Please see Last Call issues in Appendix C.
Please review since with the movement of objects from the Port to
the Printer table, some of the language might not make sense anymore.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 29 2005 - 12:33:38 EDT