Semantic Model Mail Archive: Re: SM> Santa Fe PWG Semantic M

Semantic Model Mail Archive: Re: SM> Santa Fe PWG Semantic M

Re: SM> Santa Fe PWG Semantic Model meeting minutes

Date: Wed Sep 04 2002 - 10:11:56 EDT

  • Next message: Zehler, Peter: "SM> PWG Semantic Model Weekly Phone Conference"



    I like the new group names much better.

    I think UPDF has an xsd for media names. Can we use it?


    Elliott Bradshaw
    Director, Software Engineering
    Oak Technology Imaging Group
    781 638-7534

                        Peter" To: "''" <>
                        <PZehler@crt. cc:
              > Subject: SM> Santa Fe PWG Semantic Model
                        Sent by: meeting minutes
                        08:39 AM

    The official meeting minutes from Santa Fe have been posted to the PWG
    The URL is
    "". I've
    included a text version below.

    Peter Zehler
    Xerox Architecture Center
    Voice: (716) 265-8755
    FAX: (716) 265-8871
    US Mail: Peter Zehler
            Xerox Corp.
            800 Phillips Rd.
            M/S 128-30E
            Webster NY, 14580-9701

    Printer Working Group
    Semantic Model Work Group
    Meeting Minutes
    August 26, 2002
    Santa Fe, NM

    1. Working Group formation items
               a) The mailing list is active (
               b) The web site will be updated to include the working
                         group and mail archives (Gail Songer & Pete Zehler
                         to work offline)
               c) The Chair, Scribe and Editor for the working group is
                         Peter Zehler
               d) A weekly phone conference will be set. The time is TBD.
                         Input has been requested from the participants on the
                         mail list
               e) The schedule was discussed briefly
                         i) A proposed final PWG Semantic document is targeted
                                   for the next PWG meeting
                         ii) The Last call version of the document will be
                                   ready for the January meeting
                         iii) The process for updating the Semantic Model will
                                   be in first draft form for the next PWG
                         iv) A proposed final update process will be ready for
                                   the January meeting.

    2. Semantic Model Document review
                         (Pete Zehler to make updates)
               a) Add definition of type 1, 2 and 3 keywords and include
                         reference to rfc1759
               b) Remove the "xxx" from supported, ready and default
               c) Grouping of processing attributes needs review (Pete
                         Zehler to initiate on mailing list and phone
               d) "JobLevel" Processing attributes to be removed from
                         processing group (See naming below)
               e) Status Codes should be Status strings and include
                         references like the attributes
                         i)If possible list actions that may return the Status
               f) Will Notifications be addressed in the Semantic Model?
                         (This will be resolved on the mailing list and phone

    3. Naming of attribute groups

       Printer State Attributes
       Printer Description Attributes
       Processing Defaults
       Processing Supported
       Processing Ready

       Job State Attributes
       Job Description Attributes
       Job Processing Attributes
       Default Document Processing Attributes

       Document State Attributes
       Document Description Attributes
       Document Processing Attributes

    (NOTE: For the IPP literate state and description attributes
               correspond the IPP Job/Printer description attributes.
               Processing attributes correspond to job template
               attributes. See the updated (v0.08) PWG Semantic Model for

    UPDATE: For clarity the Job's "Default Document Processing
               Attributes" was renamed to "Document Processing
               Attributes". They are exactly the same as the "Document
               Processing Attributes" of the Document.

    4. Example Schema file review
               a) The sub-groups of the processing attributes should be
                         broken out to their own xsd files
               b)Should the media names be added to the xsd file? (No
                         plans at this time. It will be discussed on the
                         mail list and phone conference)
                         i) Current size of pwgattr.xsd is 43KB.
                         ii) The size of the all the xsd files is 67KB.
                         iii) Should there be a proper media object in the
                                   schema with its own xsd file?
    The schema will be updated to reflect the changes in the Semantic

    5. Participants
    Bergman, Ronal Hitachi Koki Imaging Solutions
    Berkema, Alan Hewlett Packard
    Bigelow, Jim Hewlett-Packard
    Bradshaw, Elliott Oak Technology
    Farrell, Lee Canon
    Hall, David Hewlett-Packard
    Lewis, Harry IBM
    Nagasaka, Fumio Epson
    Songer,Gail Peerless
    Taylor, Bob Hewlett-Packard
    Thrasher, Jerry Lexmark
    Tronson, Ted Novell, Inc.
    Ueda, Shiger Canon
    Wagner, William NetSilicon
    Wright, Don Lexmark
    Yang, Yiruo Epson
    Zehler, Pete Xerox

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 04 2002 - 10:12:44 EDT