Semantic Model Mail Archive: SM> RE: CreateJob REQUIRED now

SM> RE: CreateJob REQUIRED now

From: Hastings, Tom N (hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com)
Date: Thu Dec 05 2002 - 14:59:28 EST

  • Next message: Dennis Carney: "SM> ACT - IPP "-actual" attributes latest spec, version 0.2"

    Dennis,

    Good catch! Yes, the Document Object spec has to REQUIRE the Printer to
    support the Create-Job operation, even though Create-Job is OPTIONAL in
    [RFC2911] for a Printer to support.

    I'll add this requirement to section 11.1 and to section 4.3.

    Thanks,
    Tom

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Dennis Carney [mailto:dcarney@us.ibm.com]
    Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:00
    To: hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com
    Subject: CreateJob REQUIRED now

    Tom,

    The Document Object only makes sense if the Printer that implements it also
    supports the CreateJob operation. However, CreateJob is optional in
    RFC2911. So, does the Document Object spec need to make it clear that a
    compliant implementation MUST implement CreateJob? Of course, it seems
    obvious, but I guess I was surprised not to see any mention of this at all
    in the spec.

    Dennis



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 05 2002 - 14:59:46 EST