One reason that I can think of is that I think of the version as part of the
namespace, and the "foo" to be the interface name.
The flip side of the argument is that the namespace is:
http://www.pwg.org/ps, and the interface is JobControlInterface/2003/02/12
I'm not sure what the right answer is..
From: TAYLOR,BOB (HP-Vancouver,ex1)
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:35 PM
To: HALL,DAVID (HP-Vancouver,ex1); 'email@example.com'; 'firstname.lastname@example.org'
Subject: RE: SM> Interface / Document revisioning Working Draft
One question on this since I missed last week's meeting. When we're
declaring namespaces, the recommendation appeared to be of the style:
We are right now doing the following:
I.e., pretty much the same model, but put the version/date after the service
declaration rather than in the middle of it. I think this makes more sense
there a specific reason to put the version/date in the middle instead of on
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HALL,DAVID (HP-Vancouver,ex1) [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 8:26 AM
> To: 'firstname.lastname@example.org'; 'email@example.com'
> Subject: SM> Interface / Document revisioning Working Draft
> Hey All..
> Attached are the notes from Tuesdays PSI meeting.. I
> apologize for the late
> publication, but I've been absolutely swamped since Tuesday!
> Keep in mind that this is a work in progress...
> <<Spec Stuff.doc>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 12 2003 - 18:10:30 EST