Semantic Model Mail Archive: RE: SM> SM Schema update

RE: SM> SM Schema update

From: McDonald, Ira (imcdonald@sharplabs.com)
Date: Fri Apr 07 2006 - 19:49:41 EDT

  • Next message: Zehler, Peter: "RE: SM> SM Schema update"

    Hi Pete,
     
    [This time with some body content...]
     
    I've browsed over your updates - they look good to me.
     
    One point - in 'PwgSemanticModel.xsd', where the top level objects
    are rooted under Server, the Subunits and specific services are fine,
    but the SystemTotals are supposed to go in the (missing) System
    object (see WimsBase.xsd) in the SystemStatus group.
     
    Also, as we proceed with integration, the generic ServiceStatus and
    ServiceDescription groups now defined in the generic Service object
    (also in WimsBase.xsd) should be included in the content of each
    of the specific services. For ease of extension, the generic Service
    object should ALSO be included under Server (so that vendors can
    easily instantiate a new kind of service).
     
    I'll be off the map for a week at the OSDL Printing Summit, but I'll
    get back to you the week after.
     
    Cheers,
    - Ira

    Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
    Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
    PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
    phone: +1-906-494-2434
    email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-sm@pwg.org [mailto:owner-sm@pwg.org]On Behalf Of Zehler, Peter
    Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 12:22 PM
    To: sm@pwg.org
    Subject: SM> SM Schema update

    All,
     
    I have created an updated version of the SM schema. I hope this can be the
    basis for extension work.
    A local version (i.e. relative links to schema files stored in the same
    directory) of the schema is available at

    < HYPERLINK
    "ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/Semantic-Model/Schema/PWG-SM-040706.zip"ftp://ftp
    .pwg.org/pub/pwg/Semantic-Model/Schema/PWG-SM-040706.zip>. I have included
    an XMLSPY project file.
     
    The date when I can have an straw man schema that includes Subunits,
    Counters and Imaging Device Services Framework is right now.
     
    What I have done is
    1) Added the subunits as a peer of the services (e.g. Printer)
    2) Added services for an Imaging device (e.g. FaxIn)
    3) Included Counters which I believe are up to date with the approved
    specification
    4) Added includes to all subschema so that each is valid on its own (makes
    it easier to edit and traverse)
    5) Update the SM namespace
     
    What I have not done is
    1) Resolve the name conflict between Subunits and SM (I put Subunits in its
    own namespace as a stopgap solution)
    2) Renamed the services to be consistent with WIMS
    3) Added WIMS (except for Subunits)
    4) Updated the master list of elements
    5) Done anything to the SM specification
     
    Pete
    Peter Zehler
    XEROX
    Xerox Innovation Group
    Email: Peter.Zehler@XeroxLabs.com
    Voice: (585) 265-8755
    FAX: (585) 265-7441
    US Mail: Peter Zehler
    Xerox Corp.
            800 Phillips Rd.
            M/S 128-25E
    Webster NY, 14580-9701

     

    --
    No virus found in this incoming message.
    Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.0/304 - Release Date: 4/7/2006
    

    -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.0/304 - Release Date: 4/7/2006



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Apr 07 2006 - 19:49:56 EDT