I vote for one PDL per UPDF.
Jim
At 3/26/01 12:17 PM, Norbert Schade wrote:
>We never finally decided whether we will allow exactly one PDL per UPDF
>description or more.
>I put that on vote.
>Please send your vote this week.
>We will decide on Friday, March 30th, late afternoon.
>
>My personal vote is one PDL only.
>Reasons:
>Don't move more information around than you need.
>Editing of XML files is easier, when there are parrallel files (master
>description, command sequences, locales, etc.) instead of editing
>different sections in very different areas of one huge file.
>Development is possible in steps done by different groups, while one huge
>description probably never gets done.
>
>Regards
>Norbert Schade
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 26 2001 - 22:01:57 EST