attachment
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi Ira,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I completely agree with your statement. Just because we are lacking tests validating a requirement doesn't mean we should withdraw the requirement - we should add tests. I shouldn't have conflated my identifying this issue with my query about whether we should be requiring LOC records in 5100.14. I should have raised that in a separate context so that the two issues didn't get associated with one another.</div><div class=""><br class=""><div class="">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><span style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;" class="">Smith</span><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;" class=""><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;" class=""><span style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;" class="">/**</span><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;" class=""><div class=""><span style="font-family: ArialMT; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);" class=""> Smith Kennedy<br class=""> Wireless Architect - Client Software - IPG-PPS</span><span style="font-family: ArialMT;" class=""></span><div style="font-family: ArialMT;" class=""><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);" class=""> Standards - IEEE ISTO PWG / Bluetooth SIG / Wi-Fi Alliance / NFC Forum / USB IF</span></div><div style="font-family: ArialMT;" class=""><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);" class=""> PWG Chair<br class=""> HP Inc.</span></div></div><div style="font-family: ArialMT;" class=""><span style="font-family: Arial; orphans: 2; widows: 2;" class="">*/</span><br style="font-family: Arial; orphans: 2; widows: 2;" class=""></div><div style="font-family: ArialMT;" class=""><span style="font-family: Arial; orphans: 2; widows: 2;" class=""><br class=""></span></div></div></div></div></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 2016-05-15, at 9:23 AM, Ira McDonald <<a href="mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com" class="">blueroofmusic@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class="">Hi,<br class=""><br class=""></div>I am strongly opposed to reducing requirements in PWG 5100.14 (or any<br class=""></div>other IETF or PWG IPP spec) just because there is not a current test for<br class=""></div>the requirement in the self-cert tools.<br class=""><br class=""></div>Cheers,<br class=""></div>- Ira<br class=""><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all" class=""><div class=""><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr" class="">Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)<br class="">Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG<br class="">Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG<br class="">Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group<br class="">Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG<br class="">IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB<br class="">Blue Roof Music / High North Inc<br class=""><a style="color:rgb(51,51,255)" href="http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic" target="_blank" class="">http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic</a><br class=""><a style="color:rgb(102,0,204)" href="http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc" target="_blank" class="">http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc</a><br class="">mailto: <a href="mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com" target="_blank" class="">blueroofmusic@gmail.com</a><br class="">Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094<br class="">Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434<br class=""><br class=""><div style="display:inline" class=""></div><div style="display:inline" class=""></div><div style="display:inline" class=""></div><div class=""></div><div class=""></div><div class=""></div><div class=""></div></div></div></div>
<br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 1:47 PM, <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:smith.kennedy@hp.com" target="_blank" class="">smith.kennedy@hp.com</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">[Issue Unconfirmed]<br class="">
<br class="">
PWG 5100.14 section 4.2.2 requires Printer objects to publish LOC records<br class="">
for their service. But 5100.20 lacks a requirement to test for them.<br class="">
(Should we eliminate them from 5100.14 or make them optional?)<br class="">
<br class="">
Link: <a href="http://www.pwg.org/issues/36" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">http://www.pwg.org/issues/36</a><br class="">
<br class="">
_______________________________________________<br class="">
ipp mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" class="">ipp@pwg.org</a><br class="">
<a href="https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp</a><br class="">
</blockquote></div><br class=""></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">ipp mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" class="">ipp@pwg.org</a><br class="">https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>