attachment
<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:UICTFontTextStyleBody;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>By quick skim, PDF/Raster appears to be the raster capability the exists within PDF, with some additional restrictions. Not quite sure why it requires a separate specification, except for the comment that it is the file format required by “TWAIN Working Group’s new TWAIN Direct specification -- the first zero-footprint, cloud-based version of its royalty free open standard protocol that allows applications to talk directly to document scanners without the need for vendor specific drivers.” That us the rub and would suggest that IPP Everwhere/Scan would have some very serious competition, if we ever formalized it. The scanner industry has a long history using TWAIN and, as in other areas, it will tend to continue with what is familiar. Still, a common imaging protocol for MFDs may find some support.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The IPP Scan Service spec appears to require that Scan Services support PDF. Modifying that to allow lower end devices to support a PDF subset not be a major effort and might have some benefit in showing some degree of universality. Is there any product that uses IPP Scan?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks, Bill Wagner</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div style='mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal style='border:none;padding:0in'><b>From: </b><a href="mailto:smith.kennedy@hp.com">Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect)</a><br><b>Sent: </b>Friday, September 1, 2017 9:51 AM<br><b>To: </b><a href="mailto:ptykodi@tykodi.com">Paul Tykodi</a><br><b>Cc: </b><a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org">ipp@pwg.org</a><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [IPP] PDF Raster and IPP Scan</p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>Just playing devil's advocate here. What does PDF/raster provide that the existing formats do not? Why did a new subset format need to be defined? <o:p></o:p></p><div id=AppleMailSignature><div><p class=MsoNormal>Cheers,<br><br><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Smith<br><br><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>---<br><br><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><br><br><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> Smith Kennedy<br><br><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> Wireless Architect - Client Software - IPG-PPS<br><br><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> Standards - PWG / Bluetooth SIG / Wi-Fi Alliance / NFC Forum<br><br><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> Chair, IEEE ISTO Printer Working Group<br><br><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> HP Inc.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:14.5pt;font-family:"UICTFontTextStyleBody",serif'><br><br><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><br>On Sep 1, 2017, at 6:35 AM, Paul Tykodi <<a href="mailto:ptykodi@tykodi.com">ptykodi@tykodi.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Hi,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div id=AppleMailSignature><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div id=AppleMailSignature><p class=MsoNormal>I saw this announcement this morning.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div id=AppleMailSignature><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div id=AppleMailSignature><p class=MsoNormal>Should we consider adding support for this format in IPP Scan?<o:p></o:p></p></div><div id=AppleMailSignature><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div id=AppleMailSignature><p class=MsoNormal><a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2017/08/prweb14644230.htm">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2017/08/prweb14644230.htm</a><br><br>Best Regards,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div id=AppleMailSignature><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div id=AppleMailSignature><p class=MsoNormal>/Paul<o:p></o:p></p></div><div id=AppleMailSignature><p class=MsoNormal><br>Sent from my iPhone<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:5.0pt;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:5.0pt;margin-left:.5in'>_______________________________________________<br>ipp mailing list<br><a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org">ipp@pwg.org</a><br><a href="https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp">https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>