attachment
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Greetings,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">In our November 2018 vF2F, we discussed an issue I raised about how IPP could convey via "printer-state-reasons" transient non-critical states such as "warming-up" or "cooling-down". It was suggested in the F2F minutes (<a href="http://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-f2f-minutes-20171115.pdf" class="">http://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-f2f-minutes-20171115.pdf</a>) that we should consider an update to MFD Alerts:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div class=""><a href="https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/candidates/cs-pmpmfdalerts10-20120629-5107.3.pdf" class="">https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/candidates/cs-pmpmfdalerts10-20120629-5107.3.pdf</a> </div><div class=""><a href="https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/candidates/cs-pmpmfdalerts10-20120629-5107.3.doc" class="">https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/candidates/cs-pmpmfdalerts10-20120629-5107.3.doc</a> </div></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I am willing to start updating this if that is the place to do it. But I wanted to confirm this as the appropriate direction. Is this what is needed? Or would simple registrations work just as well, at least for IPP?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks for your thoughts,</div><div class=""><br class=""><div class="">Smith<br class=""><br class="">/**<br class=""> Smith Kennedy<br class=""> Wireless & Standards Architect - IPG-PPS<br class=""> Standards - IEEE ISTO PWG / Bluetooth SIG / Wi-Fi Alliance / NFC Forum / USB-IF<br class=""> Chair, IEEE ISTO Printer Working Group<br class=""> HP Inc.<br class="">*/<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""></div><br class=""></div></body></html>