attachment
<div dir="ltr"><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>Looks fine to me with Mike's suggested edits.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>- Ira</div><div><br></div><div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)<br>Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG</div><div>Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG<br></div><div dir="ltr">Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG<br>Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group<br>Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG<br>IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB<br>Blue Roof Music / High North Inc<br><a style="color:rgb(51,51,255)" href="http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic</a><br><a style="color:rgb(102,0,204)" href="http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc</a><br>mailto: <a href="mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com" target="_blank">blueroofmusic@gmail.com</a><br>PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434<br><br><div style="display:inline"></div><div style="display:inline"></div><div style="display:inline"></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:21 AM Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect) via ipp <<a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org">ipp@pwg.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style="overflow-wrap: break-word;">I like it!<div><br></div><div>Unless there are any other suggestions, I'm going to run with that, and post an updated document later this morning.</div><div><br></div><div><div>
Smith<br><br><br>
</div>
<div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Jul 1, 2019, at 6:49 PM, Michael Sweet <<a href="mailto:msweet@msweet.org" target="_blank">msweet@msweet.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="gmail-m_-3857534212349689859Apple-interchange-newline"><div><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:14px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none;float:none;display:inline">Smith,</span><div style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:14px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none"><br></div><div style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:14px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none">Quick feedback:</div><div style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:14px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none"><br></div><div style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:14px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none">- End initial sentence with "are to:" (add "to")?</div><div style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:14px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none">- Item 1: "currently defined for IPP" is awkward<br><div>- Add "and" at the end of item 1.</div><div>- Item 2: "Describe implementation considerations for authentication ..." (identification has already happened, you are describing the items that were identified during the development of the document)</div><div>- Item 2: "protocol technical concerns" should read "technical protocol concerns"</div><div><br></div><div>That would make it:</div><div><br></div></div><blockquote style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:14px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none;margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:medium none;padding:0px"><div><div>3.5 Design Requirements</div></div><div><div><br></div></div><div><div>The design requirements for this IPP Authentication Methods Best Practice document are to:</div></div><div><div><br></div></div><div><div>1. Illustrate how each authentication method integrates into IPP interaction flows; and</div></div><div><div>2. Describe implementation considerations for authentication in general, including factors that influence user experience and technical protocol concerns.</div></div></blockquote><div style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:14px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none"><div><br><blockquote type="cite">On Jul 1, 2019, at 3:20 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect) via ipp <<a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" target="_blank">ipp@pwg.org</a>> wrote:<br><br>Greetings,<br><br>From our LCRC review of IPP Authentication Methods, it was pointed out in the review that the document was lacking a "Design Requirements" subsection to section 3. We decided to post a draft here on the reflector, and once consensus was reached, to add that to the final draft to be used in the PWG Formal Vote of Approval.<br><br><br>3.5 Design Requirements<br><br>The design requirements for this IPP Authentication Methods Best Practice document are:<br><br>1. Illustrate how each authentication method currently defined for IPP integrates into IPP interaction flows;<br>2. Identify and describe points to be considered in implementing Client or Printer support for authentication in general, including factors that influence user experience as well as protocol technical concerns.<br><br><br>Thoughts?<br><br>Smith<br><br>/**<br> Smith Kennedy<br> HP Inc.<br>*/<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>ipp mailing list<br><a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" target="_blank">ipp@pwg.org</a><br><a href="https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/NaEyCmZ6o6hjkD2Y5HGAJTC?domain=pwg.org" target="_blank">https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp</a><br></blockquote><br><div>________________________<br>Michael Sweet</div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
ipp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" target="_blank">ipp@pwg.org</a><br>
<a href="https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp</a><br>
</blockquote></div>