attachment
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi Mike,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">In the minutes from the last F2F (<a href="https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-f2f-minutes-20200506.pdf" class="">https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-f2f-minutes-20200506.pdf</a>) covering the review of IPP Enterprise Printing Extensions v2.0, it says this toward the bottom of page 4:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><blockquote style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;" class=""><div class="">
<div class="page" title="Page 4">
<div class="section" style="background-color: rgb(100.000000%, 100.000000%, 100.000000%)">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<ul style="list-style-type: none" class="">
<li class=""><p class=""><span style="font-size: 12pt;" class="">⁃ </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;" class="">Decouple job-state from Job Release:
</span></p>
<ul style="list-style-type: none" class="">
<li class=""><p class=""><span style="font-size: 12pt;" class="">⁃ </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;" class="">job-state-reasons provides the Release state information
</span></p>
</li>
<li class=""><p class=""><span style="font-size: 12pt;" class="">⁃ </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;" class="">While 1.0 says job-password holds a job, subsequent
</span></p><p class=""><span style="font-size: 12pt;" class="">implementation experience shows that processing a job is
also a valid implementation semantic - any job-state is OK
for job-password
</span></p>
</li>
<li class=""><p class=""><span style="font-size: 12pt;" class="">⁃ </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;" class="">Also valid for a Printer to hold a job that has a release action </span></p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></blockquote><div class="">I'm wondering what this means and how this might affect the document. Are you saying that I need to change the language for "job-password" to soften it so that it isn't a hard requirement for the Job to be in the 'pending-held' state initially? I'm trying to not break backward compatibility so I'm not sure what to do with this.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks for any help,</div><div class=""><br class=""><div class="">Smith<br class=""><br class="">/**<br class=""> Smith Kennedy<br class=""> HP Inc.<br class="">*/</div><br class=""></div></body></html>