attachment
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi Mike,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">No objections to adding this but a few thoughts:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">- PII concerns?</div><div class="">- Overlap with the key/value pairs provided by "printer-device-id" - the "SN" key isn't standardized but is out there...</div><div class=""><br class=""><div class="">
Smith<br class=""><br class="">/**<br class=""> Smith Kennedy<br class=""> HP Inc.<br class="">*/
</div>
<div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Dec 1, 2020, at 6:47 AM, Michael Sweet via ipp <<a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" class="">ipp@pwg.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="content-isolator__container"><div class="protected-part"><div class="protected-title">Signed PGP part</div><div class="protected-content"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">All,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I was looking for a place to report a printer's hardware serial number and noticed that we never defined one for an IPP Printer object, just the System object (where it is OPTIONAL).</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I propose we add this to NODRIVER. Based on the text in the IPP System Service specification this would look something like the following:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><blockquote style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;" class=""><div class="">6.7.N printer-serial-number (text(255))</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">This RECOMMENDED attribute provides the serial number for the Printer and is semantically equivalent to the prtGeneralSerialNumber element defined in [RFC3805].</div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I'm proposing this as RECOMMENDED since a) why define it if we don't want it implemented, and b) because not every Printer is backed by a hardware output device and so won't necessarily have a serial number to report.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">This sort of information is commonly available via printer drivers/utilities (for support purposes) and so it fits with the focus of NODRIVER.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thoughts?</div><div class=""><br class=""><div class="">________________________<br class="">Michael Sweet<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""></div><br class=""></div></div></div></div><br class=""><iframe class="content-isolator__isolated-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" scrolling="auto" width="200" height="10" style="border:none;display:block;overflow:auto;" data-src="data:text/html;charset=UTF-8;base64,PGlmcmFtZS1jb250ZW50IGRhdGEtaWZyYW1lLWhlaWdodD0idHJ1ZSI+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX188QlI+aXBwIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdDxCUj5pcHBAcHdnLm9yZzxCUj5odHRwczovL3d3dy5wd2cub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vaXBwPEJSPjwvaWZyYW1lLWNvbnRlbnQ+"></iframe></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>