attachment
<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Yes, sorry </span>30x90 is correct here, contention is just the 2 10x15” media sizes.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Anton Thomasson via ipp<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, October 18, 2025 1:24 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp@pwg.org><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Anton Thomasson <antonthomasson@gmail.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [IPP] [EXTERNAL] Media size issue for 10x15"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">30x90 will be centimeters, which is the every-day unit for small-ish things in the rest of the world.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Nothing strange here, just SI/metric at work.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Br,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Anton<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Den fre 17 okt. 2025 kl 23:30 skrev Michael Ziller via ipp <<a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org">ipp@pwg.org</a>>:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks, I'll attend.<br>
<br>
Also, how do these IANA namings make any sense?<br>
<br>
oe_photo-20x30_20x30in - 20x30 as in inches<br>
om_photo-30x90_300x900mm - 30x90 as in ???<br>
<br>
Is oN_photo-XxY just some shorthand which has no meaning in terms of units? 30x90 is not in inches, nor in mm.<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Michael Sweet <<a href="mailto:msweet@msweet.org" target="_blank">msweet@msweet.org</a>>
<br>
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2025 1:59 PM<br>
To: Michael Ziller <<a href="mailto:mziller@microsoft.com" target="_blank">mziller@microsoft.com</a>><br>
Cc: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <<a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" target="_blank">ipp@pwg.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [IPP] Media size issue for 10x15"<br>
<br>
Michael,<br>
<br>
> On Oct 17, 2025, at 3:57<span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span>PM, Michael Ziller <<a href="mailto:mziller@microsoft.com" target="_blank">mziller@microsoft.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> But I thought IANA did not permit duplicate paper size registrations:<br>
> na_10x15_10x15in - already IANA registered<br>
> oe_photo-s10r_10x15in - not IANA registered, but in MSN2.1<br>
> <br>
> So won't they reject registering oe_photo-s10r_10x15in?<br>
<br>
They don't validate the registry beyond conformance to the XML schema, avoiding duplicate dimensions for media size names is our thing.<br>
<br>
That said, what I see is that MSN 2.1 defined both of these sizes - na_10x15_10x15in is an envelope size and oe_photo-s10r_10x15in is a photo size.<br>
<br>
Let's discuss this at the next IPP concall and I'll remove one of the sizes and mark it for removal from the next revision of MSN.<br>
<br>
________________________<br>
Michael Sweet<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ipp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" target="_blank">ipp@pwg.org</a><br>
<a href="https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp" target="_blank">https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>