attachment-0001
Hi,<br><br>On reflection, another Out-of-Scope:<br><br>OOS-3. Do not define an abstract Power Management Service Interface.<br>For example, use native CIM methods for any DMTF CIM binding of the <br>PWG Power Management Model, conformant with the DMTF CIM Power <br>
State Management Profile [DSP1027]. <br><br>Rationale: The PWG MFD WG may wish to, in the future, define abstract <br>power management admin operations for the System and Subunit objects <br>in the PWG Semantic Model/2.0, but they are not needed at this time.<br>
<br>Cheers,<br>- Ira<br><br><br clear="all">Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)<br>Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG<br>Blue Roof Music/High North Inc<br>email: <a href="mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com">blueroofmusic@gmail.com</a><br>
winter:<br> 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176<br> 734-944-0094<br>summer:<br> PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839<br> 906-494-2434<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Ira McDonald <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com">blueroofmusic@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Bill,<br><br>Attempting to more constructively help out...<br><br>I just posted a draft of a charter for WIMS Power Mgmt Project:<br><br> <u style="color: rgb(51, 102, 255);"><a href="ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/wd/wd-wimspower-charter-20090511.htm" target="_blank">ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/wd/wd-wimspower-charter-20090511.htm</a><br>
</u><br>I followed the format approved by the PWG in IPP PSX project<br>and more recently the MFD WG (basically the same idea).<br>Especially, it includes a specific Out-Of-Scope section.<br><br>Please add a brief Problem Statement (replace <tbd>).<br>
<br>The Milestones during Definition Phase (Initial draft, Prototype<br>draft, and PWG Last Call for each of Model and Binding specs) <br>are the ones the PWG Steering Committee agreed on for MFD <br>- the SC specifically do not want a milestone such as 'PWG CS',<br>
because a WG can't project that.<br><br>Comments?<br><br>Cheers,<br>- Ira<br><br clear="all">Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)<br>Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG<br>Blue Roof Music/High North Inc<br>
email: <a href="mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com" target="_blank">blueroofmusic@gmail.com</a><br>winter:<br> 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176<br> 734-944-0094<br>summer:<br> PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839<br> 906-494-2434<br>
</blockquote></div><br>
<br />--
<br />This message has been scanned for viruses and
<br />dangerous content by
<a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is
<br />believed to be clean.