My apologies, as I mentioned before, I'll need to miss the 10/6 meeting. I have
also had to face the pile of "real" work post the Denver meeting and haven't
focused on my submission at all. I realize the longer I drag the less enthusiasm
it will be received with. I'll do my best to get something out prior to your
discussion, or, next week, at least.
I agree... I think there are still several avenues and proposals to discuss. I
recommend Henrik also write his up.
Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems
harryl at us.ibm.com
"Manros, Carl-Uno B" <cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com> on 09/30/99 11:13:11 AM
To: henrik.holst at i-data.com, ipp at pwg.org
cc:
Subject: RE: IPP> Notification methods
Henrik,
I expect that we will carry on the discussions about this in the next
meeting in which IBM also wanted to present their proposal.
Are you planning to attend the next meeting?
Carl-Uno
> -----Original Message-----
> From: henrik.holst at i-data.com [mailto:henrik.holst at i-data.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 3:32 AM
> To: ipp at pwg.org> Subject: IPP> Notification methods
>>> I liked the ideas in Hugo's HTTP notification proposal. I
> have been thinking of
> doing a TCP/UDP notification proposal, but I think they may
> be very similar. So
> maybe we should do one common document describing the
> 'Report-IPP-Notification'
> operation and new attributes and then two documents
> describing the mapping
> to HTTP and TCP/UDP.
>> Henrik Holst
>>