I favor just 'New Printer and Job Admin Operations, Set 2'
and 'New Device Admin Operations, Set 1' (and suitably
clear filenames for I-Ds).
- Ira McDonald
High North Inc
From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 3:28 PM
To: Ron Bergman; Tom Hastings; cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com
Subject: IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents
Sounds like a problem we should fix in the titles of Set2 and Set3.
However, Carl-Uno and I suggest that we should have some more description in
the title too, such as:
Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Administrative Operations, Set 2
Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Job and Printer Operations, Set 2
Internet Printing Protocol: Device Operations, Set 3
(or should the latter be Set 1, since we haven't had any Device operation
For comparison, the current name for the Set operations is:
Internet Printing Protocol: Job and Printer Set Operations
Carl-Uno suggests we discuss this on the IPP telecon this Wednesday, and on
the mailing list.
From: Ron Bergman [mailto:rbergma at hitachi-hkis.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 17:43
To: Tom Hastings; cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com
Subject: Set2 Operations
This title is becoming extremely confusing. I suggest it be changed to:
Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Operations, Set 2
And a similar change for set 3.
These titles appear to be more descriptive. i.e. they are actually
*additional* operations, not *set* operations.