IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents

IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents

IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents

McDonald, Ira imcdonald at sharplabs.com
Mon Feb 28 18:41:19 EST 2000


Hi Tom,
Hi Tom,

I favor just 'New Printer and Job Admin Operations, Set 2'
and 'New Device Admin Operations, Set 1' (and suitably
clear filenames for I-Ds).

Cheers,
- Ira McDonald
  High North Inc

-----Original Message-----
From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 3:28 PM
To: Ron Bergman; Tom Hastings; cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com
Cc: ipp
Subject: IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents


Sounds like a problem we should fix in the titles of Set2 and Set3.
However, Carl-Uno and I suggest that we should have some more description in
the title too, such as:

Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Administrative Operations, Set 2

or:

Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Job and Printer Operations, Set 2

and:

Internet Printing Protocol: Device Operations, Set 3

(or should the latter be Set 1, since we haven't had any Device operation
yet?)


For comparison, the current name for the Set operations is:

Internet Printing Protocol: Job and Printer Set Operations

Carl-Uno suggests we discuss this on the IPP telecon this Wednesday, and on
the mailing list.

Comments?

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Bergman [mailto:rbergma at hitachi-hkis.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 17:43
To: Tom Hastings; cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com
Subject: Set2 Operations


Tom,

This title is becoming extremely confusing.  I suggest it be changed to:

    Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Operations, Set 2

And a similar change for set 3.

These titles appear to be more descriptive.  i.e. they are actually
*additional* operations, not *set* operations.

    Ron Bergman



More information about the Ipp mailing list