IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents

IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents

IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents

Ron Bergman rbergma at hitachi-hkis.com
Mon Feb 28 19:24:15 EST 2000


I like Ira's names except I would like to maintain the current
"Set" sequence.  I propose:

   "New Printer and Job Admin Operations (Set 2)"

and

   "New Device Admin Operations (Set 3)"

To be consistant, we should have also used the name:

   "Job and Printer Set Operations (Set 4)"

But no need to make any retrofits.

    Ron



"McDonald, Ira" wrote:

> Hi Tom,
> Hi Tom,
>
> I favor just 'New Printer and Job Admin Operations, Set 2'
> and 'New Device Admin Operations, Set 1' (and suitably
> clear filenames for I-Ds).
>
> Cheers,
> - Ira McDonald
>   High North Inc
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 3:28 PM
> To: Ron Bergman; Tom Hastings; cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com
> Cc: ipp
> Subject: IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents
>
> Sounds like a problem we should fix in the titles of Set2 and Set3.
> However, Carl-Uno and I suggest that we should have some more description in
> the title too, such as:
>
> Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Administrative Operations, Set 2
>
> or:
>
> Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Job and Printer Operations, Set 2
>
> and:
>
> Internet Printing Protocol: Device Operations, Set 3
>
> (or should the latter be Set 1, since we haven't had any Device operation
> yet?)
>
> For comparison, the current name for the Set operations is:
>
> Internet Printing Protocol: Job and Printer Set Operations
>
> Carl-Uno suggests we discuss this on the IPP telecon this Wednesday, and on
> the mailing list.
>
> Comments?
>
> Tom
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron Bergman [mailto:rbergma at hitachi-hkis.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 17:43
> To: Tom Hastings; cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com
> Subject: Set2 Operations
>
> Tom,
>
> This title is becoming extremely confusing.  I suggest it be changed to:
>
>     Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Operations, Set 2
>
> And a similar change for set 3.
>
> These titles appear to be more descriptive.  i.e. they are actually
> *additional* operations, not *set* operations.
>
>     Ron Bergman




More information about the Ipp mailing list