IPP> Re: Root OID for IPP Printer Schema

IPP> Re: Root OID for IPP Printer Schema

IPP> Re: Root OID for IPP Printer Schema

harryl at us.ibm.com harryl at us.ibm.com
Fri Apr 21 15:42:19 EDT 2000




Personally, I don't care about "politically" correct, I'm simply trying to
be correct.

I think a standards track RFC will carry the IETF copyright meaning the
IETF is ultimately responsible for "change control" and would (presumably)
desire not to have OIDs managed and maintained by a private enterprise.

Granted, there's not a lot of dynamics available that could inadvertently
"hose" an assigned OID subtree... no matter where it lies.

Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems




"Alexis Bor" <alexis.bor at directoryworks.com>
Sent by: owner-ipp at pwg.org
04/21/00 01:02 PM


        To:     "Manros, Carl-Uno B" <cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com>, "Bruce
Greenblatt"
<bgreenblatt at directory-applications.com>, Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS,
<mark.wahl at innosoft.com>, <ietf-ldapext at netscape.com>
        cc:     <ipp at pwg.org>
        Subject:        RE: IPP> Re: Root OID for IPP Printer Schema


All we are doing is making IETF more politically correct, and thus making
politics slow down the technical process...  Are we going to go through
several version of the draft arguing over this???

Let's just choose one and move on...    It will not impact the sales of
any
products nor the operation of any protocol...

-- Alexis

Alexis Bor
Directory Works, Inc.
alexis.bor at directoryworks.com
http://www.directoryworks.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Manros, Carl-Uno B [mailto:cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 11:33 AM
To: Bruce Greenblatt; harryl at us.ibm.com; mark.wahl at innosoft.com;
ietf-ldapext at netscape.com
Cc: ipp at pwg.org
Subject: RE: IPP> Re: Root OID for IPP Printer Schema

Bruce,

It is politically incorrect. We had objections raised in IET47 on this.

Carl-Uno Manros
IETF IPP Chair


-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Greenblatt [mailto:bgreenblatt at directory-applications.com]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 11:26 AM
To: harryl at us.ibm.com; mark.wahl at innosoft.com; ietf-ldapext at netscape.com
Cc: ipp at pwg.org
Subject: IPP> Re: Root OID for IPP Printer Schema


What's wrong with continuing to use the one from Sun?  As long as it is
unambiguous, who cares?

Bruce

At 11:59 AM 4/21/2000 -0600, harryl at us.ibm.com wrote:
>
>
>
>The Internet Printing Protocol Working Group is developing an Internet
>Draft describing an LDAP Schema for Printer Services.
>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipp-ldap-printer-schema-00.t

xt
>
>
>For expediency, the initial draft specifies OIDs from a Sun Microsystems
>private enterprise subtree. In preparation for a standards track document
>we would like these OIDs to be routed in a standards subtree. We want to
>harmonize with any convention that may exist within the LDAP community
for
>registering this subtree. Will the LDAP group make the request for an
>assigned OID subtree or would you prefer for the IPP group to make the
>request?
>
>Harry Lewis
>
>
>
==============================================
Bruce Greenblatt, Ph. D.
Directory Tools and Application Services, Inc.
http://www.directory-applications.com
Sign up for our LDAP Technical Overview Seminar at:
http://www.acteva.com/go/dtasi







More information about the Ipp mailing list