IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - The IPP Notification I-Ds will now go the IESG)

IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - The IPP Notification I-Ds will now go the IESG)

IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - The IPP Notification I-Ds will now go the IESG)

Herriot, Robert Robert.Herriot at pahv.xerox.com
Tue Aug 15 14:24:04 EDT 2000


-----Original Message-----
From: pmoore at peerless.com [mailto:pmoore at peerless.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 2:55 PM

First -  we all agreed not to do it. This seems like a good reason not to do
it.

[rgh reply] 
I concur that at the last meeting we did agree not to have a Machine
Consumable format in 'mailto'. However, earlier this year we were going in
the opposite direction and tried to get a Machine Consumable format to work
in 'mailto'. We seemed to give up because the solutions were too complex.

When I discovered this simple solution, I thought it would be good to find
out if PWG member are opposed to a Machine Consumable format regardless of
the solution or are opposed only to complex solutions.


Bob Herriot




More information about the Ipp mailing list