From: pmoore at peerless.com [mailto:pmoore at peerless.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 2:55 PM
First - we all agreed not to do it. This seems like a good reason not to do
I concur that at the last meeting we did agree not to have a Machine
Consumable format in 'mailto'. However, earlier this year we were going in
the opposite direction and tried to get a Machine Consumable format to work
in 'mailto'. We seemed to give up because the solutions were too complex.
When I discovered this simple solution, I thought it would be good to find
out if PWG member are opposed to a Machine Consumable format regardless of
the solution or are opposed only to complex solutions.