Hi Bob,
Most recent version <draft-ietf-ipp-notify-mailto-02.txt>
(internally dated 13 July, file date at IETF server 21 July),
section 6.2 'Message Body', fourth paragraph, lines 925 to 927,
bottom of page 16:
"A Printer MUST send the following localized information in the message
body. The specific working of this information and its layout are
implementation dependent." (followed by a list on the top of page
17 of various attributes that are MUST.
A global search for MUST in this spec and a careful reading would
be a good idea, but section 6.2 is normative for the body content.
Cheers,
- Ira
-----Original Message-----
From: Herriot, Robert [mailto:Robert.Herriot at pahv.xerox.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 2:44 PM
To: McDonald, Ira; Herriot, Robert; 'jkm at underscore.com'
Cc: 'ned.freed at innosoft.com'; ipp at pwg.org
Subject: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM -
The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]
Please give me more context, such as document version and line number.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald at sharplabs.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 7:58 AM
> To: 'Herriot, Robert'; McDonald, Ira; 'jkm at underscore.com'
> Cc: 'ned.freed at innosoft.com'; ipp at pwg.org> Subject: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM -
> The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]
>>> Hi Bob,
>> So I checked again (as I did yesterday). Bottom of page 16
> for message body content says MUST for a list of localized
> content.
>> That has to be fixed.
>> Cheers,
> - Ira
>>> -----Original Message-----
> From: Herriot, Robert [mailto:Robert.Herriot at pahv.xerox.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 1:48 PM
> To: McDonald, Ira; Herriot, Robert; 'jkm at underscore.com'
> Cc: 'ned.freed at innosoft.com'; ipp at pwg.org> Subject: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM -
> The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]
>>>>> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald at sharplabs.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 1:24 PM
> > To meet your (and other PWG members) desires, simply
> > delete all language about the content OR change it
> > be SHOULD (RECOMMENDED) and punt on testing.
>> The language in the spec has said "SHOULD" all along.
>> We have tried to recommend content in a general way and leave
> the specific
> phrasing to the vendor. For example, we recommend that a
> printer name be
> present, but let the vendor choose the words.
>