[IPP] (Another) New PWG Raster Format draft posted

[IPP] (Another) New PWG Raster Format draft posted

Petrie, Glen glen.petrie at eitc.epson.com
Tue Apr 26 18:21:25 UTC 2011


Oh!  Ok!

 

________________________________

From: Michael Sweet [mailto:msweet at apple.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 11:06 AM
To: Petrie, Glen
Cc: Ira McDonald; ipp at pwg.org
Subject: Re: [IPP] (Another) New PWG Raster Format draft posted

 

Glen, the filename doesn't need to reflect the whole document title.
Also, we'd need to change the charter to reflect the new name.

 

I really don't see the need to change the filename...

 

On Apr 26, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Petrie, Glen wrote:





So it should be wd-ipppwgraster

 

________________________________

From: Ira McDonald [mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 9:35 AM
To: Petrie, Glen; Ira McDonald
Cc: Michael Sweet; ipp at pwg.org
Subject: Re: [IPP] (Another) New PWG Raster Format draft posted

 

Hi Glen,

No - our PWG Naming Policy requires that the first part
of the filename be the responsible working group.

Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
<http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc> 
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Christmas through April:
  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176
  734-944-0094
May to Christmas:
  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
  906-494-2434






On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Petrie, Glen
<glen.petrie at eitc.epson.com> wrote:

Since the title of document is called the "PWG Rater Format" I believe
we should change the file name to wd-pwgraster10-xxxxx instead of
wd-ippraster10-xxxxx

Glen


-----Original Message-----
From: ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Sweet
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 9:37 PM
To: ipp at pwg.org
Subject: [IPP] (Another) New PWG Raster Format draft posted


All,

The previous updated draft of the PWG Raster Format has two whole
subsections accidentally deleted from it... Here is a newer and even
better version with the lost subsections added back in along with the
IANA IPP registration templates for good measure:

  ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327-rev.pdf
  ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327.pdf
  ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327.docx

The -rev version shows the changes from the last "good" version (Feb
23rd)...

________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp at pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp at pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

 

 

________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20110426/4487a3ca/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list