Anton,
> On Aug 31, 2023, at 2:42 PM, Anton Thomasson <antonthomasson at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>> Thank you!
> Also thanks to Uli Wehner for an off-list reply.
>> What fails to compute for me is why PWG-raster wants, suggesting it needs, this information that it can't really do much with.
> But i guess i will just not worry, and leave these things default - pretending as if a higher application layer had pre-transformed everything.
> (And not expose these settings)
>> So, finally, am i correct in understanding that i should under no circumstances produce landscape-shaped raster?
Long-edge feed trays will function better (faster) if you send landscape aspect ratio raster data, and roll-fed media should always be provided in the indicated dimensions.
________________________
Michael Sweet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20230831/6215c301/attachment.html>