Comments inline below.
Peter Zehler
Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
From: Ira McDonald [mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2011 8:14 PM
To: Zehler, Peter; Ira McDonald
Cc: mfd at pwg.org
Subject: FaxLogUri *still* missing in FaxInServiceDescription SM schema
Hi Pete,
I've been working on the FaxIn spec per August F2F review.
In section 6.6, I need FaxLogUri, but it's *still* missing in SM v1.147
(it's present only in FaxOut spec and the FaxOutService schema).
<PZ>Added in v1.149</PZ>
So here's my opinion about the equivalent FaxOutServiceDescription
service-specific elements for FaxIn:
Compression[Default/Supported] - No
DefaultFaxModem - No
DocumentFormat[Default/Supported/DetailsXxx] - No*
FaxLogUri - Yes (REQUIRED)
MultipleDocumentJobsSupported - Yes (OPTIONAL)
MultipleOperation[Timeout/TimeoutXxx] - No
ServiceChargeInfoUri - Yes
ServiceOrganizations - Yes
<PZ>Everything in v1.149 except MultipleDocumentJobsSupported which is
in v 1.150</PZ>
*DocumentFormat belongs in FaxInDocumentProcessing[Capabilities],
so that documents sent to the DestinationUris get the right format,
right?
Similar conceptually to ScanService? I think all analagous Scan
elements
should be available for processing FaxIn documents in order to be able
to send reasonably to a variety of destinations.
<PZ>I don't quite agree. I think that capabilities and defaults are
applicable to the FaxInService. However, I think that the capabilities
are used by a FaxInService user to determine the allowed values when
creating an entry in AvailableFaxInJobTicket. FaxInJobs are
initiated/created by an inbound FAX protocol initiation. A FaxInService
user configures what happens when an inbound FAX is received. If none
of the configured FaxInMetrics match, then the FaxIn ServiceDefaults
would be used. I expect the operations (as of yet undefined) would
focus on FaxInService configuration including the setting of job routing
and handling (i.e. AvailableFaxInJobTickets.</PZ>
NOTE - There's an error in PWG 5108.5 (FaxOut) where FaxLogUri is
optional in the schema, according to my reading of the spec.
<PZ>Corrected in v 1.149.</PZ>
I think we've made a mistake making the FaxInDocument single-valued
in the schema, because we're keeping the text saying that support for
multiple document jobs is optional (per our August F2F review).
<PZ>Corrected in v 1.149.</PZ>
I did add the various notes about PSTN FaxIn being inherently single
document jobs.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
<http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
<http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20111031/57c17476/attachment-0001.html>