Hi Harry and Ron,
I agree that it's a good idea - I share Ron's wonderment about
finding active workers.
Cheers,
- Ira McDonald
-----Original Message-----
From: Bergman, Ron [mailto:Ron.Bergman at Hitachi-hkis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 9:56 PM
To: 'Harry Lewis'; fin at pwg.org; pwg at pwg.org
Cc: don at lexmark.com; Bergman, Ron; Robert Jessen
Subject: FIN> RE: Standard Finishing Terms
Harry,
After beating my head against the wall for so long, it starts to feel
good;-) Why not another;-)
Seriously, this is a good idea. Don't know how many people have much time
to devote to it though.
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Lewis [mailto:harryl at us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 4:22 PM
To: fin at pwg.org; pwg at pwg.org
Cc: don at lexmark.com; rbergma at hitachi-hkis.com; Robert Jessen
Subject: Standard Finishing Terms
I've had a request from the UP3i group to use some of our Fin MIB
terminology definitions in their Finishing glossary. I think this is a
good idea. To avoid copyright issues it might be a good idea to draft a
central industry glossary.
Since we're having so much fun with the Media Size List... I'm wondering
how the group feels about hosting such an effort within the ISTO PWG.
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems
----------------------------------------------