Thanks Harry.
I would add that the discussion of bindings settled on the binding being a separate document, not an appendix.
Other items of potential interest are that the IBM UML sequence diagram(s) would be incorporated in the general section of the spec., that we had some discomfort with the size and effort of the WIMS Object spec effort as well as the fact that it reverts to schema as normative documentation, and that it may be time to reactivate the Requirements document effort.
Bill Wagner
-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Lewis [mailto:harryl at us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 1:16 PM
To: wims at pwg.org
Subject: WIMS> Conference Call mins - 10/20/2004
Minutes are posted
<ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/minutes/wims_041020.pdf> ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/minutes/wims_041020.pdf
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
IBM STSM
Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
http://www.pwg.org
IBM Printing Systems
http://www.ibm.com/printers
303-924-5337
----------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/wims/attachments/20041021/9b3369db/attachment.html