WIMS> CIM> DRAFT slides for CIM core meeting [one error]

WIMS> CIM> DRAFT slides for CIM core meeting [one error]

wamwagner at comcast.net wamwagner at comcast.net
Fri Jan 13 15:31:42 EST 2006


Ira, 

Agreed. December is good and justifiable, and reflects more a plan than a vague objective.

Bill Wagner

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald at sharplabs.com> 

> Hi Rick, 
> 
> Thanks - very good slides at just the right level of detail 
> for our PWG/CIM Core joint teleconference next Friday. 
> 
> One important error - on the last page, the completion date 
> for the CIM Extensions (aka WP#3) should be "Q4 2006" and 
> not "August 2006" (much too soon), as reflected in Craig's 
> minutes from our 5 January 2006 WIMS-CIM teleconference. 
> 
> Personally, I think we should just call it "December 2006", 
> given that the last PWG face-to-face of the year is in the 
> last week of October 2006 and it will take some time to 
> process any feedback we receive then from work-in-progress 
> review. 
> 
> Cheers, 
> - Ira 
> 
> 
> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) 
> Blue Roof Music / High North Inc 
> PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 
> phone: +1-906-494-2434 
> email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: owner-wims at pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims at pwg.org]On Behalf Of 
> wamwagner at comcast.net 
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 7:42 PM 
> To: Richard_Landau at Dell.com; wims at pwg.org 
> Subject: Re: WIMS> CIM> DRAFT slides for CIM core meeting 
> 
> 
> ALL: (sorry for multiple truncated messages; I must be hitting some hidden 
> send key combination) 
> 
> Rick: Many thanks. Concise. Only suggestion is to reword title "PWG-CIM 
> Alignment Plan" rather than "Status" 
> 
> I suggest agenda of: 
> 
> 1. Introduction (very short) 
> a. Statement of project objectives 
> b. Identification of participants 
> c. Objectives of Call 
> 2. PWG Plan and Schedule for Alignment 
> a. Slides 
> b. Solicit comments 
> 3. Discuss and Solicit Suggestions on Mechanics of CR submission 
> a. number vs size 
> b. submission procedure 
> c. anticipated followup activity, and time 
> 
> Is there anything else we need out of this meeting? 
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> Bill Wagner 
> 
> -------------- Original message -------------- 
> From: 
> 
> > Please feel free to edit, or at least comment. 
> > 
> > rick 
> > 
> > ------------------------- 
> > Richard_Landau(at)dell(dot)com, System Mgt Arch & Stds 
> > +1-512-728-9023, One Dell Way, RR5-3 Box 8509, Round Rock, TX 78682 
> > 
> > 
> > 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/wims/attachments/20060113/076c2769/attachment.html


More information about the Wims mailing list