Nice idea, but...
1. I would *really* hate to wait to get the new properties into
Printer. I think we ought to leap on those with both feet. Deprecation
is slightly less important.
2. The time between public CIM versions is three months, not four to
six. If we miss version N, then version N+1 is published three months
later. We think that it is longer because of the delta between
CR-approved and next schema version published dates.
Let me ask Crandall if we can possibly fudge the deprecation for the
properties that we want to move from Printer to PrintService. If we are
going to keep the same property name and semantics, maybe it is not
crazy to say "This property will be moved...."
rick
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wims at pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims at pwg.org] On Behalf Of Ira
McDonald
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 13:52
To: William A Wagner; Ira McDonald
Cc: wims at pwg.org
Subject: Re: WIMS> CIM - Order of next printing updates
Hi Bill,
Basically that's what I'm saying.
But actually PrintService wouldn't be delayed at all. It just wasn't
going to get updated in the next cycle with the wrapup of Printer and
subunits.
The main update of PrintService is too large to do now.
Until we finish Printer and the subunits, we don't have a "package" of
Print Device classes to recommend people implement. And remember we
need two independent implementations to go from CIM Experimental (no
stability guarantees) to CIM Final.
Cheers,
- Ira
On 10/27/07, William A Wagner <wamwagner at comcast.net> wrote:
> Ira,
>> If I understand, you are suggesting to first do a CR to Print Service
> adding those elements that are intended to be relocated from Printer,
> then doing a through CR for Printer. I guess the question might be,
> could a minimal CR to Print Service pass though quickly?
> The effect would appear to be to allow a speedier completion of
> Printer at the possible cost of delaying completion of Print Service
> (probably a good tradeoff).
>> Thanks,
>> Bill Wagner
>>>> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wims at pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims at pwg.org] On Behalf Of Ira
> McDonald
> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 6:32 PM
> To: wims at pwg.org; Ira McDonald
> Subject: WIMS> CIM - Order of next printing updates
>> Hi,
>> We have four or five small edits to do in the various Printer subunit
> classes (after CIM v2.17 is published, when we can do 2.18 revisions).
>> But we also have three kinds of substantive edits to do in Printer:
> (1) Add Printer MIB v1 and v2 missing properties (a handful)
> (2) Deprecate properties now represented better in subunit classes.
> (3) Deprecate properties to be "moved" (i.e., copied) to PrintService.
>> In phone discussions, Rick has suggested to me that we'll "have to
> revise CIM_Printer several times" (because you can't do item (3) above
> until AFTER service properties have already been copied to
> PrintService, because a deprecated property MUST refer to the
replacement one).
>> But there is a very serious impedance filter in CIM updates - only ONE
> CR against a given class can be processed in a CIM update cycle (four
months).
> And a new CR can't be written for a class until the previous CIM
> version is actually *published* (several more months).
>> So, I suggest that we get a little smarter and do a small update FIRST
> to PrintService, and then submit all three items in Printer and be
> DONE with Printer.
>> The calendar difference would be four to six months sooner.
>> Comments?
>> Cheers,
> - Ira
>> --
> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) Chair - Linux Foundation
> Open Printing WG Blue Roof Music / High North Inc PO Box 221 Grand
> Marais, MI 49839
> work: +1-906-494-2434
> home: +1-906-494-2697
> email: blueroofmusic at gmail.com>>
--
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) Chair - Linux Foundation
Open Printing WG Blue Roof Music / High North Inc PO Box 221 Grand
Marais, MI 49839
work: +1-906-494-2434
home: +1-906-494-2697
email: blueroofmusic at gmail.com