IFX Mail Archive: Re: IFX> FW: option 5 for TIFF-FX [one doc

IFX Mail Archive: Re: IFX> FW: option 5 for TIFF-FX [one doc

Re: IFX> FW: option 5 for TIFF-FX [one document/two MIME types]

From: Harry Lewis (harryl@us.ibm.com)
Date: Wed Oct 10 2001 - 14:28:01 EDT

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "RE: IFX> FW: option 5 for TIFF-FX [one document/two MIME types]"

    And this is expected to satisfy the licensing issues?
    ----------------------------------------------
    Harry Lewis
    IBM Printing Systems
    ----------------------------------------------

    "McDonald, Ira" <IMcDonald@crt.xerox.com>
    Sent by: owner-ifx@pwg.org
    10/10/2001 09:24 AM

     
            To: "'ifx@pwg.org'" <ifx@pwg.org>
            cc:
            Subject: IFX> FW: option 5 for TIFF-FX [one document/two MIME types]

     

    Hi,

    Here's the request from Hiroshi Tamura (Ricoh, co-chair of
    IETF Internet Fax WG) to the editors of the TIFF-FX spec to
    work on a quick turnaround (before the Internet-Drafts
    deadline for the IETF December 2001 meeting) on a new version
    with all TIFF-FX profiles in one document but TWO different
    MIME types:
    - image/tiff - Profiles S and F (b/w only) - existing MIME type
    - image/tifx - all other profiles - new MIME type to be registered

    Cheers,
    - Ira McDonald
      High North Inc

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Hiroshi Tamura [mailto:tamura@toda.ricoh.co.jp]
    Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 6:06 AM
    To: ietf-fax@imc.org
    Cc: Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it
    Subject: Re: option 5 for TIFF-FX

    Folks,

    > As you already know, there are lots for favors for option 5.
    > Therefore, the conlusion is "option 5"

    <snip>

    > I think TIFF-FX editors and the people who support it should provide
    > somthing at first. Please do it.

    No mails so far. I comment it.

    At first, we need new two or more I-Ds.
    - Revised tiff-fx document
    - New or Revised registration document for image/tiff or/and
    new MIME type.
    At least, those documents should be available prior to December IETF
    meeting.
    The sooner, the better.

    Next, implementation tests.
    According to the I-Ds or revised I-Ds after getting some consensus
    at the meeting or in our ML, the tests should be done.
    New MIME type tests must be included.
    It may be better to include the test for Profile S and F
    with the use of image/tiff.
    At the earliest, they will be done in January or February, I think.

    After that, the final I-Ds will be availble.

    License issues should be clarified in parallel.

    Again,
    TIFF-FX editors and the people who support it should comment for it.

    Regards,

    --
    Hiroshi Tamura, Co-chair of IETF-FAX WG
    E-mail: tamura@toda.ricoh.co.jp
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 10 2001 - 14:28:14 EDT