IFX Mail Archive: IFX> Conf Call May 7

IFX Mail Archive: IFX> Conf Call May 7

IFX> Conf Call May 7

From: Gail Songer (gsonger@peerless.com)
Date: Wed May 07 2003 - 18:10:33 EDT

  • Next message: Lloyd McIntyre: "RE: IFX> Conf Call May 7"

    Next Meeting May 21, 1-3PM Pacific








    Review of PDF/is spec:

    (3.1) Fonts allowed but only for invisible text. (No font data is

    Encryption has been removed.

    No Gray color space (no release from HP); use index into sRGB (alignment
    with latest PDF). sRGB and the indexed color space must be included in
    all PDF/is docs

    Digital signatures will be allowed by PDF/a.

    Table 3-2: rearranged and reworded.

    Sec 4.3 JBIG2Decode Filter: allow profile 3 (T.89) Because 3 is a subset
    of 4 which we already allowed. Should we also allow Profile 2? Profile
    2 is a combination of Profile 1 and Profile 4....Go ahead and add it.

                Sec 4.4 is YUV a valid color space? It's legal for JPEG and
    should be the RECOMMENDED type.


    IPP Fax Protocol spec

                Section 6.6: How do we want the string to appear?
    PDF/is-1.0 (Tom Would you add this value to your spec?)

                6.6 documents-format-version-supported - Allow any flavor of



    Restart section at 9.



    -----Original Message-----
    From: Gail Songer
    Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 4:09 PM
    To: ifx@pwg.org
    Subject: IFX> Conference Call


    Should IPP Fax allow any form of PDF beside PDF/is? See the issues
    around the topic below


    Next call, Wednesday April 30 at 1PM Pacific.


    Lee Farrell

    Tom Hastings

    Rick Seeler

    Dennis Carney

    Gail Songer

    Ira McDonald



    ICC profile - no progress

    Notifications - no progress

    pwg_letter-or-A4 - no progress

    pdl-override - lots of discussion on the IPP reflector. No resolution

    digital-signature - in Document-object spec.


    The document-object spec may get bogged down. Need to keep tabs on it's
    progress; we may need to reconsider our dependence on that spec if it
    looks like it will take longer to finish last call than we are willing
    to wait.


    document-format-version - should it be used in Get-Printer-Attributes
    (should you be able to color on it? TomH)? (Ira doesn't want it)


    Ira would like to take out document-format-version and
    document-format-version-supported. Messy conformance requirements
    because we are requiring only a small part of the document-object spec
    and the document-object may not be as close to completion as previously
    thought. However, we had wanted IPPFax to allow other flavors of PDF
    and therefore would need to be able to specify what versions and you
    might not have access to an IPP port.


    Start next meeting: Section 7

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 18:08:46 EDT