IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> New IPP Model Document

IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> New IPP Model Document

RE: IPP> New IPP Model Document

Turner, Randy (rturner@sharplabs.com)
Fri, 29 May 1998 14:41:29 -0700

This may be a difficult requirement to meet if an IPP implementation is
built as an extension to a generic web server (like Apache).

Randy

-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Martin [SMTP:jkm@underscore.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 1998 2:34 PM
To: ipp@pwg.org
Cc: Puru Bish
Subject: Re: IPP> New IPP Model Document

After thinking about this, I tend to agree with Puru's
statement:

>From "Tom Hastings"
>
> :: In fact, the HTTP request header URI, if persent, takes
precedence"
> (over printer-uri/job-uri operation attributes).
>
> I think it should be the other way around. I feel the
> printer-uri/job-uri, supplied by IPP client, should have
higher
> precedence to an IPP server than the HTTP header URI.

...jay


----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- JK Martin | Email: jkm@underscore.com

--
	--  Underscore, Inc.        |  Voice:   (603) 889-7000
--
	--  41C Sagamore Park Road  |  Fax:     (603) 889-2699
--
	--  Hudson, NH 03051-4915   |  Web:
http://www.underscore.com   --
	
----------------------------------------------------------------------