I think in the case of IPP behind a generic web server, the two headers
are entirely different, and precedence does not apply. I'm pretty sure
it applies in all cases, even a dedicated IPP/HTTP server, but give me
the weekend to mull it over ;)
Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Martin
To: Turner, Randy
Cc: ipp@pwg.org
Sent: 5/29/98 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: IPP> New IPP Model Document
Randy,
> It is becoming clear to me that the two URI(URLs) actually mean
> different things, and that each URI should be handled by different
> pieces of the system; the HTTP header should be handled by the outer
> HTTP processing code, while the inner URI should be handled by the
core
> IPP code. Its almost like the HTTP URI is really the transport URI,
and
> the IPP URI really points to the IPP object to which we are
> communicating (the application layer object).
Ok, then I guess we're back to Puru's basic inquiry
revolving around precedence between the two URLs.
Based on your above statement, it sounds like we must
have NO precedence whatsoever, right?
...jay
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- JK Martin | Email: jkm@underscore.com --
-- Underscore, Inc. | Voice: (603) 889-7000 --
-- 41C Sagamore Park Road | Fax: (603) 889-2699 --
-- Hudson, NH 03051-4915 | Web: http://www.underscore.com --
----------------------------------------------------------------------