IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> The impact on users for "ipp:" URL notation?

RE: IPP> The impact on users for "ipp:" URL notation?

Larry Masinter (masinter@parc.xerox.com)
Mon, 6 Jul 1998 08:42:11 PDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Carl-Uno Manros: "RE: IPP> The impact on users for "ipp:" URL notation?"
Previous message: Ron Bergman: "RE: IPP> regarding "ipp:" (I spoke too soon...)"
In reply to: Larry Masinter: "RE: IPP> The impact on users for "ipp:" URL notation?"

> Based on more recent discussions in the WG, I do not see a major difference
> whether I write:
>
> PRINTER: ipp://www.manros.com/ipp-printer
>
> or
>
> PRINTER: http://www.manros.com/ipp-printer
>
> the same way as you use telephone numbers for both TEL: and FAX: on you
> cards today.

The former would imply the IPP port, while the latter would imply
port 80.

The port used is a major difference.

Larry

-- 
http://www.parc.xerox.com/masinter    <--- NOT MY PRINTER

Next message: Carl-Uno Manros: "RE: IPP> The impact on users for "ipp:" URL notation?"
Previous message: Ron Bergman: "RE: IPP> regarding "ipp:" (I spoke too soon...)"
In reply to: Larry Masinter: "RE: IPP> The impact on users for "ipp:" URL notation?"