Having "New" in the title of the document is probably not a good idea. Will we call the next set of Printer and Job Admin Operations the "Very Very New ... "? I'm in favor of removing "Set x" from the title. Only when we have two or more documents with identical titles should we append something like "II", "III", "IV" to the title to distinguish between them.
Two cents,
-Hugo
>>> Ron Bergman <rbergma@hitachi-hkis.com> 02/28/00 05:24PM >>>
I like Ira's names except I would like to maintain the current
"Set" sequence. I propose:
"New Printer and Job Admin Operations (Set 2)"
and
"New Device Admin Operations (Set 3)"
To be consistant, we should have also used the name:
"Job and Printer Set Operations (Set 4)"
But no need to make any retrofits.
Ron
"McDonald, Ira" wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> Hi Tom,
>
> I favor just 'New Printer and Job Admin Operations, Set 2'
> and 'New Device Admin Operations, Set 1' (and suitably
> clear filenames for I-Ds).
>
> Cheers,
> - Ira McDonald
> High North Inc
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 3:28 PM
> To: Ron Bergman; Tom Hastings; cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com
> Cc: ipp
> Subject: IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents
>
> Sounds like a problem we should fix in the titles of Set2 and Set3.
> However, Carl-Uno and I suggest that we should have some more description in
> the title too, such as:
>
> Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Administrative Operations, Set 2
>
> or:
>
> Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Job and Printer Operations, Set 2
>
> and:
>
> Internet Printing Protocol: Device Operations, Set 3
>
> (or should the latter be Set 1, since we haven't had any Device operation
> yet?)
>
> For comparison, the current name for the Set operations is:
>
> Internet Printing Protocol: Job and Printer Set Operations
>
> Carl-Uno suggests we discuss this on the IPP telecon this Wednesday, and on
> the mailing list.
>
> Comments?
>
> Tom
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron Bergman [mailto:rbergma@hitachi-hkis.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 17:43
> To: Tom Hastings; cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com
> Subject: Set2 Operations
>
> Tom,
>
> This title is becoming extremely confusing. I suggest it be changed to:
>
> Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Operations, Set 2
>
> And a similar change for set 3.
>
> These titles appear to be more descriptive. i.e. they are actually
> *additional* operations, not *set* operations.
>
> Ron Bergman
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 11:47:19 EST