IPP Mail Archive: IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2

IPP Mail Archive: IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2

IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents

From: Hastings, Tom N (hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com)
Date: Mon Feb 28 2000 - 18:27:47 EST

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "RE: IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents"

    Sounds like a problem we should fix in the titles of Set2 and Set3.
    However, Carl-Uno and I suggest that we should have some more description in
    the title too, such as:

    Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Administrative Operations, Set 2

    or:

    Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Job and Printer Operations, Set 2

    and:

    Internet Printing Protocol: Device Operations, Set 3

    (or should the latter be Set 1, since we haven't had any Device operation
    yet?)

    For comparison, the current name for the Set operations is:

    Internet Printing Protocol: Job and Printer Set Operations

    Carl-Uno suggests we discuss this on the IPP telecon this Wednesday, and on
    the mailing list.

    Comments?

    Tom

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Ron Bergman [mailto:rbergma@hitachi-hkis.com]
    Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 17:43
    To: Tom Hastings; cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com
    Subject: Set2 Operations

    Tom,

    This title is becoming extremely confusing. I suggest it be changed to:

        Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Operations, Set 2

    And a similar change for set 3.

    These titles appear to be more descriptive. i.e. they are actually
    *additional* operations, not *set* operations.

        Ron Bergman



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 28 2000 - 18:33:43 EST