"Hastings, Tom N" wrote:
> I agree completely. And I think that the Conformance section 5.2.6
> of the Model and Semantics is saying exactly that:
Hmm, I'm not sure it is. My impression is that the paragraph as
stated indicates that you are only required to handle the values
defined in the Model document, and not any additional values that
might be defined by an extension.
I think we need to change it to read:
An IPP object MUST be able to accept any of the attribute syntaxes
defined in Section 4.1, including their full range and any
>>> value tags that are undefined in this document, in any operation
in which a client may supply attributes or the system ...
Section 4.1 only covers the standard attributes, but not the
-- ______________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products email@example.com Printing Software for UNIX http://www.easysw.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 08:04:39 EST