IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> TES: Mandatory IPP notification a

IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> TES: Mandatory IPP notification a

Re: IPP> TES: Mandatory IPP notification agreement

From: henrik.holst@i-data.com
Date: Fri Jun 23 2000 - 07:56:08 EDT

  • Next message: don@lexmark.com: "RE: IPP> TES: Mandatory IPP notification agreement"

    Well, IPP stands for Internet Prininting Protocol. If we wants to describe
    to the world
    how we think Internet print should work, I think it's a design fail to use
    a technology
    that won't work, i.e. mandatory a method that won't go from the outside to
    the inside
    of the firewall. I have nothing against the INDP method, but I think we
    have to keep
    in mind what we first tried to solved, i.e. "how to print over the
    Internet":

    Henrik

    Jay Martin <jkm@underscore.com> on 23-06-2000 13:47:15

    Please respond to jkm@underscore.com

    To: henrik.holst@i-data.com
    cc: ipp@pwg.org

    Subject: Re: IPP> TES: Mandatory IPP notification agreement

    henrik.holst@i-data.com wrote:
    >
    > I just think it's really strange if we describe an Internet Printing
    > Protocol but the mandatory notification method won't work in 99% of
    > the user cases!

    Would you be so kind as to explain what you believe is the "99%" case?
    I'm confused about what *most* PWG participants believe are the *real*
    use cases for IPP. (I guess I've been a bit confused about this since
    the very beginning.)

         ...jay



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 08:07:18 EDT