Well, IPP stands for Internet Prininting Protocol. If we wants to describe
to the world
how we think Internet print should work, I think it's a design fail to use
a technology
that won't work, i.e. mandatory a method that won't go from the outside to
the inside
of the firewall. I have nothing against the INDP method, but I think we
have to keep
in mind what we first tried to solved, i.e. "how to print over the
Internet":
Henrik
Jay Martin <jkm@underscore.com> on 23-06-2000 13:47:15
Please respond to jkm@underscore.com
To: henrik.holst@i-data.com
cc: ipp@pwg.org
Subject: Re: IPP> TES: Mandatory IPP notification agreement
henrik.holst@i-data.com wrote:
>
> I just think it's really strange if we describe an Internet Printing
> Protocol but the mandatory notification method won't work in 99% of
> the user cases!
Would you be so kind as to explain what you believe is the "99%" case?
I'm confused about what *most* PWG participants believe are the *real*
use cases for IPP. (I guess I've been a bit confused about this since
the very beginning.)
...jay
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 08:07:18 EDT