Given that IPP was originally conceived as being an Internet
protocol and *not* particularly an intranet protocol, I agree
with Bill and Elliot and cast all my votes for e-mail.
...jay
ElliottBradshaw@oaktech.com wrote:
>
> Same vote (all for email), same reasoning.
>
> Elliott Bradshaw
> Director, SW Engineering
> Oak Technology Imaging Division
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wagner,William [mailto:bwagner@digprod.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 10:53 AM
> To: ipp@pwg.org
> Subject: RE: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method
> by July 7
>
> Since this preference indication is only for what is in the spec as
> mandated, I cast all four points for MAIL TO. That is not to detract from
> the merit or even (under certain circumstances) the superiority of one or
> more of the other approaches, and I am assuming that at least INDP and IPP
> (although the latter may not technically be notification) will be specified,
> implemented and verified.
>
> William A. Wagner (Bill Wagner)
> Director of Technology
> Imaging Division
> NETsilicon, Inc.
> 781-398-4588
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 29 2000 - 19:34:37 EDT