IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notifica

IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notifica

Re: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method byJuly 7

From: Jay Martin (jkm@underscore.com)
Date: Thu Jun 29 2000 - 19:26:01 EDT

  • Next message: Atsushi Uchino: "Re: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method by July 7"

    Given that IPP was originally conceived as being an Internet
    protocol and *not* particularly an intranet protocol, I agree
    with Bill and Elliot and cast all my votes for e-mail.

            ...jay

    ElliottBradshaw@oaktech.com wrote:
    >
    > Same vote (all for email), same reasoning.
    >
    > Elliott Bradshaw
    > Director, SW Engineering
    > Oak Technology Imaging Division
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Wagner,William [mailto:bwagner@digprod.com]
    > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 10:53 AM
    > To: ipp@pwg.org
    > Subject: RE: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method
    > by July 7
    >
    > Since this preference indication is only for what is in the spec as
    > mandated, I cast all four points for MAIL TO. That is not to detract from
    > the merit or even (under certain circumstances) the superiority of one or
    > more of the other approaches, and I am assuming that at least INDP and IPP
    > (although the latter may not technically be notification) will be specified,
    > implemented and verified.
    >
    > William A. Wagner (Bill Wagner)
    > Director of Technology
    > Imaging Division
    > NETsilicon, Inc.
    > 781-398-4588



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 29 2000 - 19:34:37 EDT