IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notifica

IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notifica

RE: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method by July 7

From: Herriot, Robert (Robert.Herriot@pahv.xerox.com)
Date: Fri Jun 30 2000 - 18:24:30 EDT

  • Next message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method by July 7"

    Indeed email is the only notification that is a true Internet protocol, but
    it is intended for notification to a human rather than to machine.

    For notification to a machine, Indp is great within the intranet, and
    ipp-get works on the Internet. But ipp-get is really polling with some hints
    from the Printer about when to poll again.

    So each Delivery Method is flawed.

    My vote is:

    2 email
    1 indp
    1 ipp-get
    0 snmp

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Jay Martin [mailto:jkm@underscore.com]
    Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 4:26 PM
    To: ipp@pwg.org
    Subject: Re: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method
    byJuly 7

    Given that IPP was originally conceived as being an Internet
    protocol and *not* particularly an intranet protocol, I agree
    with Bill and Elliot and cast all my votes for e-mail.

            ...jay

    ElliottBradshaw@oaktech.com wrote:
    >
    > Same vote (all for email), same reasoning.
    >
    > Elliott Bradshaw
    > Director, SW Engineering
    > Oak Technology Imaging Division
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Wagner,William [mailto:bwagner@digprod.com]
    > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 10:53 AM
    > To: ipp@pwg.org
    > Subject: RE: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method
    > by July 7
    >
    > Since this preference indication is only for what is in the spec as
    > mandated, I cast all four points for MAIL TO. That is not to detract from
    > the merit or even (under certain circumstances) the superiority of one or
    > more of the other approaches, and I am assuming that at least INDP and IPP
    > (although the latter may not technically be notification) will be
    specified,
    > implemented and verified.
    >
    > William A. Wagner (Bill Wagner)
    > Director of Technology
    > Imaging Division
    > NETsilicon, Inc.
    > 781-398-4588



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 30 2000 - 18:32:38 EDT