IPP Mail Archive: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification

IPP Mail Archive: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification

IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method by July 7

From: don@lexmark.com
Date: Thu Jun 29 2000 - 06:55:05 EDT

  • Next message: Zehler, Peter: "RE: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method by July 7"

     a) over email - 2
     b) over IPP - 0
     c) over INDP - 2
     d) over SNMP - 0

    If we don't mandate, we will never achieve any degree of interoperability.

    **********************************************
    * Don Wright don@lexmark.com *
    * Chair, Printer Working Group *
    * Chair, IEEE MSC *
    * *
    * Director, Strategic & Technical Alliances *
    * Lexmark International *
    * 740 New Circle Rd *
    * Lexington, Ky 40550 *
    * 859-232-4808 (phone) 859-232-6740 (fax) *
    * (Former area code until 10/1 was 606) *
    **********************************************
    ---------------------- Forwarded by Don Wright/Lex/Lexmark on 06/29/2000 06:56
    AM ---------------------------

    cmanros%cp10.es.xerox.com@interlock.lexmark.com on 06/28/2000 08:17:16 PM

    To: ipp%pwg.org@interlock.lexmark.com
    cc: (bcc: Don Wright/Lex/Lexmark)
    Subject: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method by July 7

    All,

    The IETF does not do voting, but we can ask people to allocate weights to
    their favorite method. From the result I hope to get a picture of whether we
    have a clear "rough consensus" favorite, or if we should just avoid trying
    to make any particular notification delivery method the "required" or
    "mandated" one.

    So let the weightings begin!

    Here are the rules:

    1) We have 4 candidate notification delivery methods, briefly described as:

     a) over email
     b) over IPP (a.k.a. intelligent polling)
     c) over INDP (new IPP-like protocol, but works in the opposite direction)
     d) over SNMP

    2) You have a total of maximum 4 weight points to allocate between the 4
    methods above.

     a) You can put all your 4 points on one favorite and leave the other three
    with 0 each. (the 'all eggs in one basket' option)
     b) If you don't really mind which method, you can give 1 point to each of
    the methods. (the 'chicken' option)
     c) You can allocate your 4 points somewhere between the two extreme cases
    above. (the 'diplomatic' options)
     d) If you don't want to make ANY of the methods "required" or "mandated",
    put a 0 for ALL four methods! (the 'don't even try it' option)

    If you still haven't understood the rules, please read the above text 3 more
    times, before you make a fool of yourself....., or of me for not being clear
    enough ;-{

    So please collect your wits and send your weights to the IPP DL no later
    than next Friday July 7!

    Have fun.... and remember that if you do not participate you cannot win!

    Carl-Uno

    Carl-Uno Manros
    Principal Engineer - Xerox Architecture Center - Xerox Corporation
    701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
    Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
    Email: manros@cp10.es.xerox.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 29 2000 - 07:03:30 EDT