IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> notification methods

IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> notification methods

RE: IPP> notification methods

From: Adams, Charles A (charles.a.adams@opbu.xerox.com)
Date: Thu Jul 20 2000 - 11:52:58 EDT

  • Next message: pmoore@peerless.com: "IPP> Notifiaction spec"

    Oops. That sounds like a reasonable proposal
    one which printer vendors would easily be able
    to support.

    Interoperability would then be
    placed in the arms of the client vendors
    and they could do what they need to do
    to support the implementations provided
    by the various printer vendors.

    Chuck Adams
    Office Printing Business Unit
    Xerox Corporation.

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: pmoore@peerless.COM [mailto:pmoore@peerless.COM]
    > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 8:32 AM
    > To: ipp@pwg.org
    > Subject: IPP> notification methods
    >
    >
    > Following the SF meeting I would like to formally propose the
    > following.
    >
    > 1. If a device wants to expose human readable events then it
    > MUST support the
    > mailto method
    >
    > 2. If a device wants to expose machine readable events then
    > it MUST support the
    > INDP method
    >
    > But we do not UNCONDITIONALLY require either.
    >
    > (Now dons flame-proof clothing and awaits flaming)
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 20 2000 - 12:07:00 EDT