IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> notification methods

IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> notification methods

RE: IPP> notification methods

From: Zehler, Peter (Peter.Zehler@usa.xerox.com)
Date: Wed Jul 26 2000 - 09:22:55 EDT

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "RE: IPP> notification methods"

    Harry,

    My view is that the mailto notification is bound to human readable. The
    mailto method is bound to a standard application that presents notification
    content to a human for interpretation and consumption. INDP may contain
    octets that a human can decipher. The consumer of the content is an
    application and the application is responsible for interpreting the content.

    I resist binding mailto to Internet and INDP to intranet. I see no reason
    that INDP would not be used on the Internet. It should be a site specific
    policy decision to allow INDP or IPP through a firewall.

    As I stated before I favor a notification being sent out at INDP
    registration. That allows a notification recipient to determine if the
    infrastructure supports INDP notification.

    Pete

                                    Peter Zehler
                                    XEROX
                                    Xerox Architecture Center
                                    Email: Peter.Zehler@usa.xerox.com
                                    Voice: (716) 265-8755
                                    FAX: (716) 265-8792
                                    US Mail: Peter Zehler
                                            Xerox Corp.
                                            800 Phillips Rd.
                                            M/S 139-05A
                                            Webster NY, 14580-9701

    -----Original Message-----
    From: harryl@us.ibm.com [mailto:harryl@us.ibm.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 1:01 AM
    To: pmoore@peerless.com
    Cc: ipp@pwg.org
    Subject: Re: IPP> notification methods

    I feel a more accurate way of looking at it is:

    1. If a device is configured to provide event notification across the
    Internet it MUST support mailto
    2. If a device is configured to provide event notification in the context
    of an Intranet it SHOULD support INDP

    We could live with the proposal to bind human/mail vs. machine/indp.
    However, this ignores the fact that INDP also handles human readable.

    Harry Lewis
    IBM Printing Systems

    pmoore@peerless.com
    Sent by: owner-ipp@pwg.org
    07/20/2000 09:31 AM

            To: ipp@pwg.org
            cc:
            Subject: IPP> notification methods

    Following the SF meeting I would like to formally propose the following.

    1. If a device wants to expose human readable events then it MUST support
    the
    mailto method

    2. If a device wants to expose machine readable events then it MUST
    support the
    INDP method

    But we do not UNCONDITIONALLY require either.

    (Now dons flame-proof clothing and awaits flaming)



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 26 2000 - 09:31:21 EDT